Archive for April, 2010

Hail Sarah, Full Of Grace. The Lord Is With Thee.

Hail Sarah, Full Of Grace. The Lord Is With Thee.


SWOONRobynBeck:AFP:Getty

Via Weigel, Ted Nugent gives his view of Sarah Palin:

If Sarah Palin played a loud, grinding instrument, she would be in my
band. The independent patriotic spirit, attitude and soul of our
forefathers are alive and well in Sarah. In the way she lives, what she
says and how she dedicates herself to make America better in these
interesting times, she represents the good, while exposing the bad and
ugly. She embraces the critical duty of we the people by participating
in this glorious experiment in self-government. The tsunami of support
proves that Sarah, 46, represents what many Americans know to be common
and sensible. Her rugged individualism, self-reliance and a herculean
work ethic resonate now more than ever in a country spinning away from
these basics that made the U.S.A. the last best place.

Nugent perfectly channels Palin's appeal to a bewildered, beleaguered, older white America. This appeal is not about policies or even Palin's actual life so much as projection onto someone of an ideal type that represents something deep down in the national psyche. See if you can observe any policy reasons to support Palin in Nugent's poem. Now look at the way he conflates her neurotic fundamentalism and delusional grip on reality with those dry deists who founded this country on Enlightenment principles. Then look at how most see her as "authentic" when she is, of course, less authentic than even John Edwards. And note too the judgment that a governor who quit halfway through her first term represents a "herculean work ethic." We are in Imaginationland here.  And boy, how it makes Nugent – and so many others – feel good again, feel as if they have recaptured their country again. They see in this immaculate misconception (with a bonus miraculous birth to another symbol of the pro-life movement, a child with Down Syndrome!) the salve to every anxiety and view all criticism of her as somehow illegitimate, and stemming from a hatred of the real America. Rejecting Palin, of course, is actually a resistance to fake America, with its magical realist narratives and Christianism as a doomed cover for collapsing social norms, family breakdown and drug use. A reader writes:

Churchill's essential genius apropos
Hitler was not to see that he was rotten, which everyone did,
but to understand that Hitler had suspended the normal rules of
political engagement among his followers so that the obvious
profit/loss-gain/setback constraints of power politics no longer
applied.  Sensible warnings that he would lead his country into war and
ruin, from inside or outside, were of no value, as they would have been
to the Kaiser or even Mussolini.

There are moments in history when it
helps to see that the precedents of history no longer cover the ground.
No, of course, Palin is no Hitler — but your central insight, that the
normal rules of American political life have been suspended in
permanence for her by circumstances and her admirers (she could easily
run a campaign without ever having to face a single neutral, much less
hostile, reporter) is correct, and this counts.

Of course the Hitler analogy is way out of bounds, as my reader notes. But I do think the fact-free cult of personality around Palin – her embodiment of an idealized representation of the America some feel they are losing – does represent something new and dangerous in politics. What we see is a politician who, for a critical segment of the population (the GOP base) cannot do wrong because she is Sarah Palin. She is a symbolic, iconic figure – and her support comes from non-rational identity politics in a time of economic distress and great social change.

Look: I’ve read history. I’d rather be over-vigilant than sorry.

Email this Article
Add to digg
Add to Reddit
Add to Twitter
Add to del.icio.us
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Facebook


Arizona: Now Just Like France

Arizona: Now Just Like France

Fallows goes for the jugulaire.

Email this Article
Add to digg
Add to Reddit
Add to Twitter
Add to del.icio.us
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Facebook


Tweet Of The Day

Tweet Of The Day

SPILLChrisGraythen:Getty

"Every asshole who ever chanted 'Drill baby drill' should have to report to the Gulf coast today for cleanup duty," – Bill Maher.

I have always been in favor of Cape Wind off Cape Cod but the confluence of these two events will surely help swing public opinion further in favor of non-carbon energy. David Brooks has a very helpful column today on how government is necessary to get this industrial revolution kick-started. If the Democrats do not use this disaster to advance the energy bill ASAP, they may miss a critical moment to escape the oil-addiction even George W. Bush acknowledged in his final years.

(Photo: A boat makes its way through crude oil that has leaked from the
Deepwater Horizon wellhead in the Gulf of Mexico on April 28, 2010 near
New Orleans, Louisiana. An estimated leak of 1,000 barrels of oil a day
are still leaking into the gulf. By Chris Graythen/Getty
Images.)

Email this Article
Add to digg
Add to Reddit
Add to Twitter
Add to del.icio.us
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Facebook


Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

I think most would agree that clubbing a seal to death for its pelt is a pretty abhorrent, violent act. But is a comedic iPhone app that lets you commit that act equally untoward? Opinions will differ on that topic, for sure, but Apple's official position on the subject seems to be that is very naughty indeed. According to iPhone app developer Matt Smyth, his iPhone iSealClub app has been rejected by Apple because it contains "objectionable content." Smyth was informed of the decision on Tuesday in an email from Apple (check out this YouTube video to get a glimpse of the game in action).

Matt Smyth can’t understand why Apple rejected iSealClub: Read More

read more

BRITAIN: Sex Counselor Loses Appeal Over Firing For Refusing To Treat Gays

BRITAIN: Sex Counselor Loses Appeal Over Firing For Refusing To Treat Gays

A British high court has resoundingly rejected the appeal of a sex counselor who argued that his firing for refusing to treat gay patients amounted to religious discrimination.

Christianity deserves no protection in law above other faiths and to do so would be “irrational” , “divisive, capricious and arbitrary”, a senior judge said today, as he rejected a marriage guidance counsellor’s attempt to challenge his sacking for refusing to give sex therapy to gay couples. In the latest clash between the judiciary and Christian believers, Lord Justice Laws said that laws could not be used to protect one religion above another. He also delivered a robust dismissal to the former Archbishop of Canterbury who had warned that a series of recent court rulings against Christians could lead to “civil unrest.” To give one religion legal protection over any other, “however long its tradition, however rich its culture, is deeply unprincipled”, the judge said. It would give legal force to a “subjective opinion” and would lead to a “theocracy”, which is of necessity autocratic.”

By rejecting the appeal, the court may have set the precedent that “legislation for the protection of views held purely on religious grounds could not be justified.” Ah, if only that were true on this side of the Atlantic.

Subscribe to Joe.My.God.

Audio: Stand by your ban

Audio: Stand by your ban

Since even the uber-conservative Antonin Scalia seemed unsympathetic to their case, Concerned Women For America president Wendy Wright sounds pretty much Wendy-Wrightconvinced that her side is going to lose their attempt to have Washington state”s anti-equality petition signer’s shielded from public view. And in making this semi-concession, Wendy also makes a pretty refreshing admission for the socially conservative side: She basically tells her troops that if they’re going to to be bold enough to strip rights away in the name of God, then they are going to have to have the fortitude (or “civic courage”) to own their actions. Have a listen:

(click to play audio clip)

*SOURCE: Washington State’s Referendum 71 Privacy Before the High Court [CWA]

Now, of course her whole shpiel is built around fear-mongery nonsense. if any social conservative has faced a death threat for any anti-gay vote, the incident is (a) extremely isolated, (b) one that every credible gay activist would immediately repudiate, and (c) a form of rare extremism that could be found as often, if not more, on our side as theirs. The idea, obviously, is to make anti-fairness evangelicals sound like the victims, even (or especially) when talking about a situation where THEY. WERE. THE. AGGRESSORS. WHO. TRIED. TO. TAKE. AWAY. CIVIL. LIBERTIES.

But we do agree with Wendy for perhaps the first time since, well, ever: If one is going to sign their name to a petition or contribute to a campaign solely designed to deprive one’s LGBT neighbor in the public sector, then there should be a backbone to accompany the hurtful pen stroke. We have no problem with those rules when it comes to our own petitionary/donating actions. Neither should those who turned our lives and loves into a “culture war” in the first place.

Pride Toronto and QuAIA ignore Mammoliti ultimatum

Pride Toronto and QuAIA ignore Mammoliti ultimatum

It’s Zero Hour for Pride Toronto — at least according to Toronto city councillor and mayoral candidate Giorgio Mammoliti, who tried to reignite the debate over the parade’s inclusion of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) by issu…

Fact Check: FAIR’s 2,555,000 Dimes For “Ethno-Separatist”

Fact Check: FAIR’s 2,555,000 Dimes For “Ethno-Separatist”

Rachel Maddow interviewed Bill Wolff of the Federation of American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the group that claims credit for writing Arizona’s anti-immigration law which critics charge is a open invitation to racial profiling. In particular, Maddow drills Wolff over FAIR’s extensive associations with White Supremacists.

Brutal. So who’s the more credible party: Maddow or Wolff?

Well, we don’t have the wherewithal to fact check everything in this interview, but I knew I could easily fact-check Wolff’s denial that FAIR donated any money or had any connections with an “ethno-separatist” during a 2004 Arizona ballot initiative. Protect Arizona Now (PAN), with “ethno-separatist” Virginia Abernathy chairing its national advisory board, was the prime force behind Arizona’s Prop 200 in 2004. At 19:33 in the interview, Wolff said:

First of all, we never gave that organization a dime. And secondly, even if we were going to give them the dime, we wouldn’t have given the dime with Virginia Abernathy associated with it.

Unfortunately for Wolff, donations for ballot initiatives are reportable to the Secretary of State and posted online. According to the Arizona Secretary of State’s Web Site:

  • On April 1, 2004, FAIR gave Virginia Abernathy’s PAN $50,000, and the FAIR Congressional Task Force gave them another $50,000 more.
  • On May 11, 2004, FAIR gave PAN $25,500, and the  FAIR Congressional Task Force gave PAN another $25,000.
  • On June 11, 2004, FAIR gave PAN $50,000, and the FAIR Congressional Task Force gave PAN another $55,000.

After Abernathy exploded publicly with her ethno-separatist views, FAIR did denounce Abernathy’s views. and on September 24, FAIR shifted its support to a new group that arose from those ashes, Yes on Proposition 200, with a $60,865 donation. But yes, despite Wolff’s claim, FAIR provided Abernathy’s PAN with $255,500 out of $370,000 of reportable donations altogether.

In case you’re counting, that’s 2,555,000 dimes.


Copyright © Box Turtle Bulletin. All rights reserved.
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. Publishing this feed’s content on any web site besides Box Turtle Bulletin is strictly prohibited. If you are accessing this on another web site, then the web site hosting this content is committing theft. Please report this web site to Editor@BoxTurtleBulletin.com.
(Digital Fingerprint: ea9498dc0641a690b4f7fbd3a7339f9b)

Shopping List FAIL…Or WIN?

Shopping List FAIL…Or WIN?

epic fail photos - shopping list
Submitted by: dunno source

Note was found in a Seattle parking lot. (FAIL Blog’s hometown — this makes us so proud and disturbed at the same time)

You tell us!

View This Poll
online surveys

You can find out more about bacon lube here.


Steve Jobs: Flash Is Evil

Steve Jobs: Flash Is Evil

Apple guru Steve Jobs today issued a denouncement of Adobe’s popular Flash technology. Apple has been widely criticized because the iPad does not support Flash. Jobs’ list of complaints about Flash is quite long and concludes with this:

Besides the fact that Flash is closed and proprietary, has major technical drawbacks, and doesn’t support touch based devices, there is an even more important reason we do not allow Flash on iPhones, iPods and iPads. We have discussed the downsides of using Flash to play video and interactive content from websites, but Adobe also wants developers to adopt Flash to create apps that run on our mobile devices. We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the platform. If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools, they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available to our developers.

Have at it, fanboys.

Subscribe to Joe.My.God.